My husband and I lived
through what was the 100-year-but-eventually-called-the-500-year flood of Grand
Forks, North Dakota. While it unfolded, we debated endlessly with each other, “What was the most
accurate prognostication for the steadily rising Red River?” Who knew what was
most true? The spokesman from the National Guard who instructed us to fill
sandbags at the Guard’s emergency center even as he assured us the river was
unlikely to spill over the wall of khaki sacks of sand? The mayor of Grand
Forks who swore there was little chance we would see flooding as bad as what
the City knew in the 1970’s? Our neighbors who’d lived through the ‘70’s flood
and who were increasingly unsure Grand Forks was going to dodge the bullet this
time? My husband and I were relative newcomers to Grand Forks, having lived
there just four years. We were unsure whose word we could trust.
In the end, we
didn’t have to trust anyone’s word. The Red River taught us when to evacuate.
One sunny but freezing April morning in 1997, as we returned from the
University of North Dakota where we’d been moving low-lying books and papers
onto top shelves and desktops—in spite of assurances from the University that
this was not necessary—we drove into our neighborhood and saw, in the middle of
the street, a geyser of water shooting thirty feet into the air, a surreal site
that lifted my foot right off the gas pedal. As I made a slow turn down a side
street to avoid the water cascading before us, we saw another fountain and then
another. The Red River had inundated the water treatment plant located on its
banks. What we were seeing was the Red River coursing through the city sewers
with enough power to blow manhole covers into the air—sometimes fifty feet, we
learned later. The river needed more room than the space between its banks. It
needed more room than even the city sewers could provide. So it spit out the
manhole covers and shot onto the streets of Grand Forks.
Seeing the geysers,
my husband and I didn’t have to debate any longer. The time to evacuate had
arrived. We didn’t need the National Guard or the mayor to instruct us. We
simply grabbed the evacuation bags sitting by the back door, turned off the
water, the electricity and the gas, loaded the dogs into the car, and joined
the long line of evacuees crawling out of the city. All of us knew it was time
to head for the escarpment that lay about an hour northwest of town.
If we had yielded
to the sense of foreboding we felt as we learned of towns downstream that were
flooding, as we saw the local newspaper inexorably revise its flood stage
estimates ever upward, we could have avoided the loss of so much that we left
behind in our basement and, for some of us, on our first floors. But we wanted
to trust that those in charge were right when they insisted our street had
never flooded and therefore would not flood this time. We placed our trust in
those who claimed to be our leaders. That, as it turned out, was the riskiest
choice we made during the flood. We should have acted on the best information
we had and taken care of ourselves as best we knew how. Our biggest mistake was
in thinking that there existed social systems ‘out there’ that would watch out
for our interests as fiercely as we could ourselves.
As I wade through
contending accounts of present dire circumstances—whether I’m reading about
climate change, hydraulic fracturing, peak oil or worldwide economic problems—I
feel as if I’m back in those days just before the Grand Forks manhole covers
blew. I know the weather in central
Illinois has drastically changed. My pocketbook feels how the cost of filling
up my gas tank has tripled. I see with dread how similar the real estate bubble
and the natural gas bubble are, even as I read that even the supposedly liberal
president I helped to elect is touting fracking as part of the solution to our
energy woes. My breath stops for a moment when I consider how all us Baby
Boomers are going to grow old at the same time and how our aging and ailing
generation is going to put an incredible burden on succeeding generations.
These are not good times. The only problem is that these are circumstances from
which I cannot evacuate. None of us can. If the current times were a flood, my
husband and I would have to survive the river’s fury from the roof our house while
hoping the home’s foundation would hold.
The funny thing
about the Grand Forks flood is that it has made me skeptical to the core. I may
still look for someone whose point of view is the most reliable. I still catch
myself trying to decide whose opinion to trust. But when I’m taking care of
practical things—putting dishes away, folding the laundry, getting a meal ready
for our family—I know that whatever is coming is going to require that I do the
very best I can with the limited information I have. And that information is
telling me that we are headed for a heap of trouble.
How nice it would
be if an economic theory existed complex enough to contend with the manmade
circumstances that threaten the planet and everything living upon it—including
us. I might actually cry if a political leader was brave and effective enough
to fight for a wise course of action—whether or not it meant he or she would be
reelected. I would become downright giddy if a majority of U.S. citizens
abandoned the notion that business as it currently exists was capable of doing
anything other than pursuing another dollar to put on its ledgers. Or that even
one news source was actually capable of weighing all information to arrive at a
truly excellent analysis of a problem free of bias. But I’m not waiting for any
of those miracles to happen. In fact, when I wait for such positive events, I
actually increase the severity of what we face. As I wait for someone ‘out
there’ to make all these problems less cataclysmic, I continue to live my life
in about the same way. Business as usual isn’t just for business anymore. Business as usual is what we all choose when
we wait for someone ‘out there’ to fix the problems that we face. When hope is
what we choose instead of acting on the best information we have, then our
hopeful waiting becomes as much of a problem as the dire circumstances before
us.
These days there
are too many blown manhole covers littering our streets, too many spewing
geysers. And yet many of us continue to live our lives as if we do not see the
rising water. I guess the question becomes how high does the floodwater have to
get before we do what is necessary to work the problem?
In 1997 my husband
and I escaped the rising Red River, and lived as evacuees for two weeks while
we worried if our house was still standing. When we drove back into town—before
the return of the National Guard, local police, health care providers or
electric power—a handful of us on our street helped each other to gut our
basements, worked together to get power back into our homes, shared our food
and our bandages, and pumped out our basements. Eventually, representatives of
various social structures returned to the city, but by that time many of us had
been hard at work for two weeks or more. We took care of ourselves and we took
care of each other. We didn’t wait for those in authority to tell us what to
do. We just did the best we could.
That’s what we
need to do now: take stock of what is unfolding and make the best choices we
know how. The longer we wait for those in power or authority to provide solutions
for what we face, the more difficult our work is going to be.
My husband and I learned a powerful lesson in Grand Forks. The power of our
country lies not in its military, or its government, or its business or wealth.
The power of this country rests with its people and their ability to work hard
and care for each other. I know we would all like for someone to tell us what
is best to do, but please, people, sometimes there just isn’t anyone out there
with an answer. What do you think is best to do? If ideas occur to you as you
read that question, trust your gut and get moving. We will not all agree, but
we will have a plethora of ideas to explore—sometimes contending, that is
true—but LOTS of ideas to bring to the problems we face. That reality will be
much better than the polarized ideas that currently keep our decision-makers in
a blinking contest with no end in sight. Let them keep staring at each other.
We just need to get busy with our own ideas. Those busy staring and snarling will catch on eventually.
No comments:
Post a Comment